Abstract presented at the
First Conference of the International Shoulder Group
26 and 27 August 1996
Delft University of Technology,
The Netherlands
Orientation of axes in the elbow and forearm for biomechanical modelling
DirkJan Veeger1, Bing Yu2, Kay-Nan An2
1Institute for Fundamental
and Clinical Human Movement Sciences, VU Amsterdam
2Orthopaedic Biomechanics
Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
Introduction:
To extend a three-dimensional (3-D) model of the shoulder [1], a cadaver
study was performed in which quantitative information on the 3-D orientations
of rotation axes in the elbow and forearm was collected.
Method:
Five upper extremities were harvested from four fresh specimen at the level
of the scapula (four right, one left). Subsequently, the extremities were
fastened onto a measuring table such that the scapula was fixed and the
arm was fully free to move. Following fixation of 3-D electromagnetic sensors
(Isotrack, Polhemus) on scapula, humerus, ulna and radius, the positions
of local anatomical landmarks were digitized with an extra sensor, mounted
with a stylus. Subsequently, each arm was moved through a selection of
standard directions (elbow flexion-extension, forearm pro-supination and
glenohumeral movements), during which the position of each sensor was recorded.
A typical movement consisted of two cycles in which a joint was moved through
its full range of motion. The sampling period was 15 sec. (Fs=10Hz).
For each condition the Instantaneous Helical Axes (IHA) were calculated
[2]. For each specimen, axes were subsequently expressed relative to a
local co-ordinate system with its origin in the Epicondylus Medialis (EM)
and its X-axis in the direction of the Epicondylus Lateralis (EL), and
the Ulnar Styloid (US) in the X-Y plane. Each arm was mathematically rotated
around the elbow axis such that both the long axes of the humerus and ulna
lie within the X-Y plane. In this position, the elbow flexion angle is
zero. The rotation to this theoretical anatomical position was performed
on all landmarks on the humerus: the Acromion (AC), EL and EM.
Results and discussion:
The kinematic flexion-extension axes deviate from the axes through EM and
EL (Table 1). The data for AC and the estimated center of the humeral head
indicate that the orientations of the humerus relative to the ulna was
relatively constant over the five specimen. The pro-supination axis crosses
the flexion-extension axis at 3.3 ± 0.8 mm and an angle of 88.9
± 5.1°. This axis runs through the radial head and lies close
to the anatomical landmarks EL (13.1±2.2 mm) and US (8.0±4.5
mm). The average distance to the center of the radial head was found to
be 3.2±4.0 mm.
The findings of this study indicate that the elbow-forearm complex can
be modelled as a two DOF system. The data are in the process of being implemented
in a model of the shoulder and arm.
Table 1:
Mean (n=5) axes for flexion-extension and pro-supination, after rotation
around the elbow axis to align the ulna and radius. Sflexion
= position vector for flexion-extension, vflexion
=
unit direction vector for flexion-extension. Hum. Head = center of the
humeral head.
| Mean (N=5) |
X (cm)
|
(std)
|
Y (cm)
|
(std)
|
Z (cm)
|
(std)
|
| Hum Head |
4.33
|
1.38
|
-29.52
|
1.53
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
| Acromion (AC) |
3.22
|
1.53
|
-34.58
|
1.73
|
-0.70
|
1.82
|
| Lateral Epicondyle (EL) |
7.13
|
0.11
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
| Ulnar Styloid (US) |
8.79
|
1.84
|
26.79
|
0.93
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
| Sflexion |
3.96
|
0.99
|
0.52
|
0.24
|
0.44
|
0.82
|
| Vflexion |
-0.9759
|
0.0173
|
0.1364
|
0.0860
|
-0.0392
|
0.1635
|
| Spronation |
6.97
|
0.67
|
7.62
|
3.25
|
0.31
|
0.61
|
| Vpronation |
0.1177
|
0.0511
|
0.9918
|
0.0069
|
0.0078
|
0.0176
|
References:
[1] F.C.T. Van der Helm "A finite element musculoskeletal model of the
shoulder mechanism". J. Biomech. 27(5); 551-570.,1994
[2] H.J. Woltring, "Definition and Calculus of Attitude Angles and Instantaneous
Helical Axes from noisy Position and Attitude data". In: Proc. on the
Int. Symp. on 3-D Analysis of human Movement, Montreal, 59-62, 1991.